Compares a modern guidance system, MGS, to a classical proportional navigational, PN, homing missile guidance system in terms of performance, robustness, and ease of implementation. Quantitative first order miss distances are compared to show that MGS has the smallest miss if component tolerances can be met, but as component tolerances or measurement errors degrade, MGS degrades faster than PN until, at relatively large component or measurement errors, PN has less miss distance than MGS.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    A new look at classical versus modern homing missile guidance


    Additional title:

    Einige neue Betrachtungen klassischer gegenueber moderner Steuerung von Zielflugraketen


    Contributors:
    Nesline, F.W. (author) / Zarchan, P. (author)

    Published in:

    Electronic Progress ; 22 , 3 ; 10-17


    Publication date :

    1980


    Size :

    8 Seiten, 16 Quellen


    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English





    A New Look at Classical vs Modern Homing Missile Guidance

    F. William Nesline. / Paul Zarchan | AIAA | 1981


    An analysis of modern versus classical homing guidance

    Holder, E.J. / Sylvester, V.B. | IEEE | 1990


    Optically aided homing missile guidance

    Andrisani, ck, II, Dominick, | AIAA | 1995


    Final-value homing missile guidance.

    ABZUG, M. J. | AIAA | 1967