Compares a modern guidance system, MGS, to a classical proportional navigational, PN, homing missile guidance system in terms of performance, robustness, and ease of implementation. Quantitative first order miss distances are compared to show that MGS has the smallest miss if component tolerances can be met, but as component tolerances or measurement errors degrade, MGS degrades faster than PN until, at relatively large component or measurement errors, PN has less miss distance than MGS.
A new look at classical versus modern homing missile guidance
Einige neue Betrachtungen klassischer gegenueber moderner Steuerung von Zielflugraketen
Electronic Progress ; 22 , 3 ; 10-17
1980
8 Seiten, 16 Quellen
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
An analysis of modern versus classical homing guidance
IEEE | 1990
|Optically aided homing missile guidance
AIAA | 1995
|Final-value homing missile guidance.
AIAA | 1967
|