Direct quenching of forgings results in cost savings due to reduced energy consumption and increased production efficiency compared to the conventional reheat and quench process. Direct quenching requires specialized equipment designed for continuous processing to control microstructure and properties. Tensile, impact, fatigue, and fracture toughness properties of direct quench and conventionally heat treated SAE 1046 steel, front axle I-beams and SAE 1541 steel, front axle I-beams and steering knuckles indicate that direct quenching is an acceptable alternative to the conventional reheat and quench process.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Evaluation of Direct Quench and Conventionally Heat Treated Forgings


    Additional title:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    SAE International Congress and Exposition ; 1986



    Publication date :

    1986-02-01




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    Evaluation of direct quench and conventionally heat treated forgings

    Schlemper,C.A. / Heinritz,M. / Schreiter,E. et al. | Automotive engineering | 1986


    Evaluation of direct quenched and conventionally heat treated SAE 1046 steel axle I-beam forgings

    Druschitz,A.P. / General Motors,US | Automotive engineering | 1986



    Aluminum Alloy Forgings, Heat Treated

    SAE Technical Papers | 2012


    Aluminum Alloy Forgings, Heat Treated

    SAE Technical Papers | 2011