An independent random utility model based on Thurstone's Theory of Comparative Judgment and a constant utility model based on Luce's Choice Axiom are reviewed in detail. Predictions from the two models are shown to be equivalent under certain restrictions on the distribution of the underlying random process. Each model is applied as a stochastic choice submodel in a dynamic, multitask, environment. Resulting choice probabilities are nearly identical, indicating that, despite their conceptual differences, neither model may be preferred over the other based solely on its predictive capability.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    On Choosing Between Two Probabilistic Choice Sub-models in a Dynamic Multitask Environment


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    1984-09-01


    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    Comparison of Fully Probabilistic and Partially Probabilistic Choice Set Models for Mode Choice

    Kunhikrishnan, Parthan / Srinivasan, Karthik K. | Transportation Research Record | 2022



    Probabilistic Choice Models for Psychological Scaling

    Wickelmaier, F. / Schmid, C. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004