An independent random utility model based on Thurstone's Theory of Comparative Judgment and a constant utility model based on Luce's Choice Axiom are reviewed in detail. Predictions from the two models are shown to be equivalent under certain restrictions on the distribution of the underlying random process. Each model is applied as a stochastic choice submodel in a dynamic, multitask, environment. Resulting choice probabilities are nearly identical, indicating that, despite their conceptual differences, neither model may be preferred over the other based solely on its predictive capability.
On Choosing Between Two Probabilistic Choice Sub-models in a Dynamic Multitask Environment
01.09.1984
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Choosing Public TransportIncorporating Richer Behavioural Elements in Modal Choice Models
Online Contents | 2013
|Comparison of Fully Probabilistic and Partially Probabilistic Choice Set Models for Mode Choice
Transportation Research Record | 2022
|Probabilistic Choice Models for Psychological Scaling
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Specification tests for probabilistic choice models
Elsevier | 1982
|Specification tests for probabilistic choice models
Elsevier | 1982
|