Computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) interprets how the human body integrates vestibular, visual, and somatosensory inputs with neuromuscular systems to maintain balance. Normative CDP values utilizing clinically normal young adults are likely not representative of function for high-performing military personnel, and therefore may provide a limitation to the practicing clinician. An aviator military-specific normative database could then assist in return to duty (RTD) determinations for aviators who are recovering from either an injury to the vestibular, visual, or somatosensory systems that would affect postural sway and/or control. The goal of the current study was to define normal functional values for the tests of the CDP in military trained aviators. This includes the sensory organization test (SOT), head shake SOT, motor control test, and adaptation test. Forty-four military trained aviators completed the informed consent process and participated in the CDP portion of this study. Participants completed all tests of CDP, with test order pseudo-randomized in accordance with equipment limitations. Results of this study suggest that military aviators are high performers when compared to the publically available aged matched normative values. These normative values may provide the practicing clinician guidance when interpreting the various tests of postural control in military aviators.
Computerized Dynamic Posturography and the U.S. Army Rotary Wing Aviator: A Normative Study
2018
28 pages
Report
No indication
English
Clinical Medicine , Military personnel , Human body , Wounds and injuries , Databases , Pilots , Human performance tests , Task performance and analysis , Statistics , Cdp (computerized dynamic posturography) , Rtd (return to duty) , Sot (sensory organization tests) , Head shake sot , Motor control tests , Adaptation tests , Postural control
U.S. Army Aviator Job Analysis
NTIS | 2006
|Autorotations: A Survey of Army Aviator Opinion
NTIS | 1976
|Aviator Collection - Rolls-Royce Aviator Collection
Automotive engineering | 2012
|DataCite | 1929