Eight evaluation metrics are used to compare and contrast three coordination schemes for a system that continuously plans to control collections of rovers (or spacecraft) using collective mission goals instead of goals or command sequences for each spacecraft. These schemes use a central coordinator to either: 1) micromanage rovers one activity at a time; 2) assign mission goals to rovers; or 3) arbitrate mission goal auctions among rovers. A self-commanding collection of rovers would autonomously coordinate itself to satisfy high-level science and engineering goals in a changing partially understood environment - making the operation of tens or even a hundred spacecraft feasible


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Coordinated Continual Planning Methods for Cooperating Rovers


    Contributors:
    Barrett, A. (author) / Rabideau, G. (author) / Estlin, T. (author) / Chien, S. (author)


    Publication date :

    2007-02-01


    Size :

    4807735 byte




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Coordinated continual planning methods for cooperating rovers

    Barrett, A. / Rabideau, G. / Estlin, T. et al. | IEEE | 2001


    Coordinated continual planning methods for cooperating rovers

    Barrett, A. / Rabideau, G. / Estlin, T. et al. | NTRS | 2000



    Three Coordinated Planning Methods for Cooperating Rovers

    Chien, S. / Barrett, A. / Estlin, T. et al. | NTRS | 2000


    A comparison of coordinated planning methods for cooperating rovers

    Rabideau, Gregg / Estlin, Tara / Chien, Steve et al. | AIAA | 1999