A rule violation leading to a traffic conflict involving a vehicle and at least one agent in real-time driving scenarios, simulation, re-simulation or other application is determined to be the fault of the vehicle by determining whether the situation was “reasonably foreseeable,” determining whether the at least one agent is a vulnerable road user (VRU) and determining whether the at least one agent violated a higher priority rule than the rule violated by the vehicle. In an embodiment, on-vehicle decisions are based on a rulebook with a priority structure that accounts for responsibility and determines an “initiator” of the traffic conflict based on whether the vehicle or the at least one agent was the first to violate a rule and the first to violate a higher priority rule.
DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
2023-10-19
Patent
Electronic Resource
English
DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
European Patent Office | 2023
|DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
European Patent Office | 2025
|False discrimination of rule violations for autonomous vehicles for data processing
European Patent Office | 2025
|Real-time violations and safety monitoring system on autonomous vehicles
European Patent Office | 2022
|