Highlights We developed a methodology for selection of reflective cracking mitigation techniques under uncertainty. A nationwide literature review was conducted and a LCCA was performed. Exploratory Modeling and Analysis was coupled with MCDM to find the appropriate option. The annuity of maintaining the roadway with Fabrics and ISAC are lower compared to other methods. Fabric dominates the selection chance in almost all of the cost and performance weight combinations.
Abstract Purpose In Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlays, the existing cracks in the underlying pavements can propagate upward to the new added overlay and may cause Reflective Cracks (RC). These cracks allow water infiltration to the underlying layers and causes further moisture damage as well as weakening the unbound layers. Over the years, several methods have been developed for mitigating the RCs. This study aims to investigate the current reflective cracking mitigation methods and develop a methodology for the selection of appropriate mitigation technique. The developed model is then applied to a case study in the state of Florida. Method To accomplish this goal, a nationwide literature review was conducted to better understand the current in practice methods in the United States. Moreover, a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) in five different road types was performed to find the annuity of roadway rehabilitation for each of the mitigation methods. The uncertainty in the LCCA results is represented using Exploratory Modeling and Analysis (EMA) method. Then through a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model, a stochastic optimization model was developed to find the appropriate reflective cracking mitigation solution under Florida’s climate and road conditions, based on different cost and performance weights. Results Based on the available data for the state of Florida, the LCCA results indicate that the annuity of maintaining the roadway with Fabrics and ISAC are lower compared to other methods. However, the results of stochastic optimization model reveal that while looking at the performance and cost at the same time, different methods would be more feasible. For instance, while the cost of the used method does not matter at all and only performance matters, STRATA® is more probable to be the appropriate mitigation technique. The findings of this research are critical for decision makers to better understand the most cost-effective mitigation technique in different conditions.
A stochastic optimization approach for the selection of reflective cracking mitigation techniques
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 69 ; 367-378
2014-09-16
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
A stochastic optimization approach for the selection of reflective cracking mitigation techniques
Online Contents | 2014
|Long-Term Performance of Reflective Cracking Mitigation Techniques in Nevada
Online Contents | 2008
|Long-Term Performance of Reflective Cracking Mitigation Techniques in Nevada
Online Contents | 2008
|Long-Term Performance of Reflective Cracking Mitigation Techniques in Nevada
Transportation Research Record | 2008
|Fracture-Tolerant and Shear-Resistant Interlayers for Mitigation of Reflective Cracking
Transportation Research Record | 2019
|