AbstractThree systemic models of gravitropic response were compared by fitting different experimental data. Results indicate that fits improve with the inclusion of diagravitropic component into formulas that allow to model plagiotropic orientation. More realistic simulation of gravitropic bending along an axial organ does not improve the fit but multiplies the number of parameters and causes correlation among them. However, such a model seems to have more possibilities for further improvement.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Basic assumptions and comparison of three gravitropic response models


    Contributors:
    Stockus, A. (author)

    Published in:

    Advances in Space Research ; 14 , 8 ; 145-148


    Publication date :

    1994-01-01


    Size :

    4 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Basic Assumptions and Comparison of Three Gravitropic Response Models

    Stockus, A. / COSPAR; Interdisciplinary Scientific Commission F | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994


    Touch and Gravitropic Set-Point Angle Interact to Modulate Gravitropic Growth in Roots

    Massa, G. D. / Gilroy, S. / International Council of Scientific Unions | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003




    Gravity Perception and Gravitropic Response of Inflorescence Stems in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Fukaki, H. / Tasaka, M. / International Council of Scientific Unions; Committee on Space Research; Scientific Commission F | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999