Highlights Political affiliation positively influences acceptance of restrictive driving policy. Policy effectiveness mediates between political affiliation and policy acceptance. Policy fairness mediates between political affiliation and policy acceptance. NCA validates positive influence of political affiliation on policy acceptance.
Abstract Public opinion and their support for any new government policy depend on their beliefs on acceptance, intrusiveness, and effectiveness. Considering a varying degree of social and cultural heterogeneity, this study investigates the array of political affiliation, which analyzes the influence of political affiliations on assessment and acceptance of the restrictive driving transport policy. A case study on an odd–even restrictive driving policy implemented during November 4–11, 2019, in Delhi (India) is undertaken using quantitative research methods. The conceptual model was first empirically tested with 275 responses from male residents using partial least squares structural equation modeling and then with necessary conditions analysis for robustness of the findings. The findings show that political affiliation positively influences perceived policy effectiveness, policy fairness, and policy acceptance. This study may help policy-makers and regulators to design measures and interventions that influence broader public perspective related to the odd–even restrictive driving policy through political affiliation.
Public opinion about restrictive driving policy: Does political affiliation matter? A case study of odd-even restrictive driving policy in Delhi, India
2023-03-28
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
SAE Technical Papers | 1972
|Eliminates eight restrictive tunnels
Engineering Index Backfile | 1945
Restrictive Estimation in Tracking Problems
Springer Verlag | 2009
|