Method of validating proving ground test routines as sample of customer operations is described; comparisons of field survey and proving ground failure statistics are analyzed to establish sample reliability and severity ratios; alternative means of accelerating test program are considered, with examples indicating effect on correlation. (see also SAE -- Trans v 68 1960 p 588-97 (discussion) 597-9; SAE -- J v 68 n 4 Apr 1960 p 78-86)
How good is testing? Correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
SAE -- Paper
SAE Meeting (Detroit Section) ; 1959 Testing
1959
13 pages
Conference paper
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
How good is testing? Correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
Engineering Index Backfile | 1960
|How Good Is Testing? - a correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
SAE Technical Papers | 1960
|Perspective - Correlation of Laboratory, Proving Ground, and Customer Testing
SAE Technical Papers | 1967
|Perspective -- Correlation of laboratory, proving ground, and customer testing
Engineering Index Backfile | 1967
|Proving Ground Optimization and Damage Correlation with Customer Usage
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|