Method of validating proving ground test routines as sample of customer operations is described; comparisons of field survey and proving ground failure statistics are analyzed to establish sample reliability and severity ratios; alternative means of accelerating test program are considered, with examples indicating effect on correlation. (see also SAE -- Paper n S210 for meeting Dec 7 1959 (Detroit Sec) 13 p; see also SAE -- Trans v 68 1960 p 588-97 (discussion) 597-9)
How good is testing? Correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
SAE -- J
Society of Automotive Engineers -- Journal ; 68 , n 4
1960
9 pages
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
How good is testing? Correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
Engineering Index Backfile | 1959
|How Good Is Testing? - a correlation of customer, laboratory, and proving ground experience
SAE Technical Papers | 1960
|Perspective - Correlation of Laboratory, Proving Ground, and Customer Testing
SAE Technical Papers | 1967
|Perspective -- Correlation of laboratory, proving ground, and customer testing
Engineering Index Backfile | 1967
|Proving Ground Optimization and Damage Correlation with Customer Usage
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|