Accepted functions of both military and commercial rigid airships are outlined and divergence between two types indicated. Structural features are discussed, together with problems of mooring, water recovery, and passenger accommodation, especially in regard to their bearing on structure and performance. Comparative study of Zeppelin type and British type of car suspensions. Paper read before Roy. Aeronautical Soc. (See also - nos. 20 May 13 1921pp. 554-557, 7 figs., n 21 May 20 pp. 578-581, 4 figs., n 22 May 27 pp. 597-600, 8 figs.; Also in Aeronautical Jl., vol. 24, no. 112, Apr. 1920, pp. 143-171 and (discussion) pp. 171-184, 20 figs.; Aeronautics, vol. 18, nos. 330, 331 and 332, Feb. 12, 19 and 26, 1920, pp. 146-147, 164-167 and 182-184.)
Rigid airships and their development
Flight
Flight ; 12 , n 23
1920
4 pages
8 Figs.
Article (Journal)
English
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
Non-rigid airships, their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|