The relative speeds of aircraft in possible conflict encounterare soaring up to or even above 0.5km/s, meaning that the periodof time which includes conflict detection, reaction, andstrategical resolution of conflict, etc., before initiation of conflictavoidance maneuvering is short. Therefore, and since currentground based systems for managing, controlling and handlingaircraft movements is near its maximum capacity, the existingground based control has to be enhanced by the autonomousanti-collision and anti-conflict airborne system. Avoidanceprocedures with descent in front of the intruder are demonstratedas a continuation of autonomous airborne separationresearch begun with conflict avoidance involving descentbehind the intruder. The following continuation is necessQ/ybecause descending behind the intruder is a safe avoidanceonly when initial vertical separation exceeds the defined verticalseparation minimum.


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Alternate Conilict Avoidance With Descent in Front of the Intruder


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2005




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    Unknown




    Conflict Avoidance by Descent Behind the Intruder

    Tone Magister | DOAJ | 2004

    Free access

    Multiple Intruder Autonomous Avoidance Flight Test

    Graham, Scott / De Luca, Jan / Chen, Won-zon et al. | AIAA | 2011


    Multiple-Intruder Autonomous Avoidance (MIAA) Flight Test

    Graham, S. / De Luca, J. / Chen, W.-Z. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011



    Sampling-based collision avoidance for commercial airliners with intruder aircraft and terrain

    van den Aardweg, W. / Engelbrecht, J. A. A. / van Daalen, C. E | IEEE | 2015