Accepted functions of both military and commercial rigid airships are outlined and divergence between two types indicated. Structural features are discussed, together with problems of mooring, water recovery, and passenger accommodation, especially in regard to their bearing on structure and performance. Comparative study of Zeppelin type and British type of car suspensions. Paper read before Roy. Aeronautical Soc. (See also - no. 330, Feb. 12, 1920 pp. 146-147, no. 311 Feb 19 164-167; Also in Aeronautical Jl., vol. 24, no. 112, Apr. 1920, pp. 143-171 and (discussion) pp. 171-184, 20 figs., and Flight, vol. 12, nos. 20, 21, 22 and 23, May 13, 20, 27 and June 3, 1920, pp. 525-528, 4 figs., pp. 554-557, 7 figs., pp. 578-581, 4 figs., pp. 597-600, 8 figs.)
Rigid airships and their development
Aeronautics
Aeronautics ; 18 , n 332
1920
3 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
Non-rigid airships, their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|