Accepted functions of both military and commercial rigid airships are outlined and divergence between two types indicated. Structural features are discussed, together with problems of mooring, water recovery, and passenger accommodation, especially in regard to their bearing on structure and performance. Comparative study of Zeppelin type and British type of car suspensions. Paper read before Roy. Aeronautical Soc. (See also - (discussion) pp. 171-184, 20 figs., and Flight, vol. 12, nos. 20, 21, 22 and 23, May 13, 20, 27 and June 3, 1920, pp. 525-528, 4 figs., pp. 554-557, 7 figs., pp. 578-581, 4 figs., pp. 597-600, 8 figs.; Aeronautics, vol. 18, nos. 330, 331 and 332, Feb. 12, 19 and 26, 1920, pp. 146-147, 164-167 and 182-184.)
Rigid airships and their development
Aeronautical Jl.
Aeronautical Journal ; 24 , n 112
1920
29 pages
20 Figs.
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Non-rigid airships, their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
|Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
|Rigid airships and their development
Engineering Index Backfile | 1920
Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1921
|