Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the capacity of choice models to accommodate flexible patterns of taste heterogeneity and substitution. However, relatively little research has been done on the implication of these more advanced model structures for the computation of economic welfare and consequent benefit measures. This paper investigates the extent that degradation in model specification affects the welfare changes attributed to a transport policy measure. In particular, the focus is on the random taste heterogeneity, and simulated data are used to analyze how model estimation and assumptions about the specification to taste heterogeneity influence the ability to account for it in the user's benefits. The results indicate that there can be circumstances in which the most commonly used taste distributions cannot provide an adequate representation of the underlying distribution of tastes and that mis-specification can have unpredictable effects on benefit estimates. The implications of these findings are discussed.


    Access

    Download

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Assessing User Benefits with Discrete Choice Models


    Subtitle :

    Implications of Specification Errors Under Random Taste Heterogeneity


    Additional title:

    Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2005-01-01




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English






    Discrete Choice Models

    Ortúzar, Juan de Dios / Willumsen, Luis G. | Wiley | 2011


    Assessing transportation user benefits with maximum trip lengths

    Horowitz, Alan J. | Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1980