Buses operating in mixed traffic are subject to congestion and thus experience long delays and unreliable service. The impact of congestion on buses is more pronounced in downtown areas than elsewhere because of heavy vehicular traffic, high transit–pedestrian activity, and friction caused by curbside users. This research explored potential benefits, effects, and costs associated with bus-only lane alternatives, including effects for traffic, transit, and curbside users (e.g., parking and loading). H and I Streets, Northwest, in downtown Washington, D.C., where bus frequency reaches one every minute during peak hours, were modeled through microsimulation. Concurrent-flow lanes and contraflow bus-only lanes were analyzed. A benefit–cost analysis (BCA) was conducted for each scenario of bus-only lanes. Concurrent-flow bus-only lanes (Alternative 1) offered a low-cost solution with good benefits (reduction as high as 5 min/mi in bus travel time). However, sensitivity analysis showed that enforcement of restrictions on right turns and operations would be needed to ensure these benefits. A contraflow bus-only lane on H Street (Alternative 2) provided substantial improvements in auto and transit travel times without right-turn restrictions and with medium costs. As a result, Alternative 2 provided the most monetary benefits, according to the BCA, with a benefit–cost ratio of 28. Benefits associated with contraflow bus lanes were not contingent on enforcement, because they are self-enforcing. Couplet contraflow bus-only lanes on H and I Streets (Alternative 3) represented the highest-cost solution yet resulted in marginal benefits compared with the other scenarios because of its high impact on auto users.


    Access

    Download

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Application of Bus-Only Lanes in Downtown Washington, D.C.: Concurrent Versus Contraflow Bus Lanes


    Additional title:

    Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2016-01-01




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    CONCURRENT FLOW LANES - PHASE II w Lanes - Phase 2

    E. Miller-Hooks / X. Chen / C. S. Chou | NTIS | 2009


    Study of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes

    Hunter, William / Stewart, J. / Stutts, Jane | Transportation Research Record | 1999


    Study of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes

    Hunter, W. W. / Stewart, J. R. / Stutts, J. C. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999


    Study of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes

    Hunter, William W. | Online Contents | 1999


    Bike Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes: Applications and Observations

    St. Jacques, K. / DeRobertis, M. / American Society of Civil Engineers et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995