Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) differ from incandescent light sources in several ways that are relevant to energy and maintenance requirements of airfield lighting systems. They have higher luminous efficacy and, when designed properly, have longer useful operating lives; both factors make LEDs attractive candidates for airfield lighting. The photometric, colorimetric, and temporal characteristics of LEDs also differ from those of incandescent light sources, and these can have important implications for the appearance of runway and taxiway lighting systems. The present paper reviews publications summarizing experimental and analytical investigations designed to assess these implications with respect to the following human factors impacts: color identification, brightness and glare, visibility in fog and haze, response to onset of flashing lights, and stroboscopic effects such as the phantom array. Overall, this review of experimental evidence suggests that, in addition to their reduced energy use and maintenance requirements, LED airfield lighting can be advantageous in comparison with incandescent lighting systems used to delineate airport runways and taxiways.
Human Factors Impacts of Light-Emitting Diode Airfield Lighting
Transportation Research Record
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board ; 2626 , 1 ; 51-57
2017-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Light-emitting diode edge lighted airfield guidance sign
European Patent Office | 2016
|Tema Archive | 1974
|ACTIVE AIRFIELD LIGHTING APPARATUS AND ACTIVE AIRFIELD LIGHTING METHOD
European Patent Office | 2016
|