Information on the type, extent, and project features of hot in-place recycling (HIR), cold in-place recycling (CIR), and full-depth reclamation (FDR) was collected through an online survey of state agencies and in-place recycling contractors. Agency and contractor responses were compared, and guidelines were developed for the most appropriate traffic, climate, and geometric features of projects. Preferences for materials, mix design methods, structural design considerations, and wearing courses were summarized. Findings showed that FDR projects could be constructed in all regions, whereas CIR and HIR would require careful consideration when constructed in either hot and wet or cold and wet climates. Agencies were found to overuse HIR and CIR on roadways with low traffic volume (annual average daily traffic lower than 5,000); these roadways may have inadequate support for recycling equipment. Geometric features were more likely to restrict the use of HIR than the use of either CIR or FDR. Most agencies required the contractor to design recycled mixes. The benefits of in-place recycling included reduced use of natural materials, reduced fuel consumption, reduced emissions, and briefer lane closures. Barriers to increased use were lack of specifications, competing industries, unsuccessful experiences, lack of experienced contractors, and lack of project selection criteria.
Selection Guidelines for In-Place Recycling Projects
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
2012-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
PART 1 — PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - Selection Guidelines for In-Place Recycling Projects
Online Contents | 2012
|British Library Online Contents | 1996
|Performance and Cost of Selected Hot In-Place Recycling Projects
Online Contents | 1995
|Cold In-Place Recycling and Full-Depth Reclamation Projects by Nevada Department of Transportation
Transportation Research Record | 2006
|Truck recycling: environmental friendly guidelines
Automotive engineering | 2000
|