Future military communication networks will have a mixture of backbone terrestrial, satellite and wireless terrestrial networks. The speeds of these networks vary and they are very heterogeneous. As networks become faster, it is not enough to do reactive fault management. Our approach combines proactive and reactive fault management. Proactive fault management is implemented by dynamic and adaptive routing. Reactive fault management is implemented by a combination of a neural network and an expert system. The system has been developed for the X.25 protocol. Several fault scenarios were modeled and included in the study reduced switch capacity, increased packet generation rate of a certain application, disabled switch in the X.25 cloud, and disabled links. We also modeled the occurrence of alarms including the severity of the problem, location of the event and a threshold. To detect and identify faults we use both numerical data associated with the performance objects (attributes) in the MIB as well as SNMP traps (alarms). Simulation experiments have been performed in order to understand the convergence of the algorithms, the timing of the neural network involved and the G2/NeurOn-Line software environment and MIB design.
Automated network fault management
MILCOM, MILCOM, 1997 ; 3 ; 1244-1250
1997
7 Seiten, 20 Quellen
Conference paper
English
Automated Fault Management Based on Distributed Intelligent Propagation
British Library Online Contents | 2004
|Automated software fault measurement
NTRS | 2002
|Automated fault-tree generation for operational fault diagnosis
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Automated Software Fault-Tree Analysis
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1992
|