There is a need to validate the results of conflict-based before-after (BA) evaluations in terms of their collision reduction estimation. This study compares the results of a collision-based and a conflict-based BA safety evaluation of left-turn bay extension. Both collision and conflict data were collected and used in the evaluation. The collision-based BA evaluation was conducted by developing a Poisson–Lognormal intervention (PLNI) model which was estimated by the full Bayesian approach. The conflict-based BA analysis was performed by an extreme value theory (EVT) model developed with the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution. The comparison showed consistent results from the two approaches. The results showed a reduction of 56.2% in actual collisions from the PLNI model and a reduction of 63.9% in estimated collisions from the EVT model. These results provide support for the validity and reliability of using traffic conflicts in BA studies.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluation of left-turn bay extension


    Contributors:
    Guo, Yanyong (author) / Zheng, Lai (author) / Sayed, Tarek (author)

    Published in:

    Publication date :

    2020-01-01


    Size :

    19 pages




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    Unknown






    Before–After Evaluation of Left-Turn Lane Extension Considering Injury Severity and Collision Type

    Guo, Yanyong / Sayed, Tarek | Transportation Research Record | 2020


    Crossroad left turn early warning anti-collision method based on V2X

    ZHAO YIMING / XIA BIAO / WU QIXUAN et al. | European Patent Office | 2021

    Free access

    COLLISION DAMAGE REDUCTION DEVICE UPON RIGHT/LEFT TURN

    HORIKOME TATSUYA | European Patent Office | 2019

    Free access