Based on a review of available data from a database on large‐scale transport infrastructure projects, this paper investigates the hypothesis that traffic forecasts for road links in Europe are geographically biased with underestimated traffic volumes in metropolitan areas and overestimated traffic volumes in remote regions. The present data do not support this hypothesis. Since previous studies have shown a strong tendency to overestimated forecasts of the number of passengers on new rail projects, it could be speculated that road planners are more skilful and/or honest than rail planners. However, during the period when the investigated projects were planned (up to the late 1980s), there were hardly any strong incentives for road planners to make biased forecasts in order to place their projects in a more flattering light. Future research might uncover whether the change from the ‘predict and provide’ paradigm to ‘predict and prevent’ occurring in some European countries in the 1990s has influenced the accuracy of road traffic forecasts in metropolitan areas.
Do Road Planners Produce More ‘Honest Numbers’ than Rail Planners? An Analysis of Accuracy in Road‐traffic Forecasts in Cities versus Peripheral Regions
Transport Reviews ; 26 , 5 ; 537-555
2006-09-01
19 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Traffic surveys -- Practical methods for planners and road engineers
Engineering Index Backfile | 1948
|Traffic system analysis for engineers and planners
TIBKAT | 1967
|How and why are planners making plans, resulting in growth in urban road traffic volumes?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1964
|