Municipal governments struggle with providing accessible mobility for constituents without overburdening them with service costs. While transit offers many advantages, the cost of providing services can be prohibitive. Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) are a mobility alternative. This research answers the following question: Can TNCs be economically feasible as a replacement for bus? U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) National Transit Database (NTD) data was evaluated finding that while TNCs could replace transit in some instances (23% of cases for an exclusive TNC option; 45% of cases for shared TNCs) most of the time bus will be more cost effective. Three agency characteristics were identified to anticipate TNC cost effectiveness: ridership, service area density, and average bus operating speeds. Overall, while TNCs are unlikely to be able to replace transit completely in most cases, their flexibility allows public entities to be more creative when making mobility policy and operational decisions.
Can transportation network companies replace the bus? An evaluation of shared mobility operating costs
Transportation Planning and Technology ; 45 , 2 ; 138-158
2022-02-17
21 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
TNC , transit , break-even , operational cost , municipal , decision-making
Transportation Research Record | 2019
|Will virtual mobility replace physical mobility?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Shared Responsibility for Shared Mobility: Community-Based Transportation in Germany
Transportation Research Record | 2023
|Legislating Transportation Network Companies
Transportation Research Record | 2017
|Shared Autonomous Vehicle Mobility for a Transportation Underserved City
SAE Technical Papers | 2023
|