Budget shortfalls resulting from the recent recession have prompted some US transit agencies to increase passenger fares for mass transit. Given that the top 20 US agencies, representing 83% of transit trips, either already have or plan to implement a smart card fare collection system and are looking to increase farebox revenue, we propose introducing a “Best Fare” alongside the next fare increase. A “Best Fare” can guarantee that riders will pay no more for incremental trips than they would if they purchased a discounted pass covering the equivalent time period. This policy supports transit-dependent riders for whom prepayment for multiple trips to receive the associated discount may present a financial hardship. We apply this concept in a nonlinear Fair Fare Policy (FFP) model using cross-elasticities between fare products to determine the revenue from a fare increase that is and is not coupled with a Best Fare. We provide agency decision makers a case study of how one agency could increase revenue and reduce ridership loss using a Best Fare alongside a fare increase.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Fair Fare Policies: Pricing Policies that Benefit Transit-Dependent Riders


    Additional title:

    Int.Ser.Operations Res.


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2011-08-21


    Size :

    22 pages





    Type of media :

    Article/Chapter (Book)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Unbanked Transit Riders and Open Payment Fare Collection

    Brakewood, Candace / Kocur, George | Transportation Research Record | 2013


    Unbanked Transit Riders and Open Payment Fare Collection

    Brakewood, Candace | Online Contents | 2013


    Implementation of Transit Fare Policies: Workshop II

    J. Reading / P. Mayworm / E. Page et al. | NTIS | 1981



    Survey of Fare Policies at Large Transit Systems

    Hinebaugh, D. / Boyle, D. K. / National Research Council; Transportation Research Board | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994