In civil engineering, a seismic fragility curve is popularly used to predict failure probability of structures under different earthquakes, and hence propose essential rehabilitation strategies through risk assessment for future earthquakes. The curve shows the failure probability as a function of seismic intensity, e.g., spectral acceleration at fundamental frequencies of structures (Sa, T1), and can be obtained using one of three approaches: engineering judgment, empirical studies or numerical simulations. The paper focuses on constructing seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations, where robust approaches of seismic reliability analysis are based on direct Monte Carlo simulation technique. The MCS based method usually requires a relatively large number of simulations to obtain a sufficiently reliable estimate of the fragility. It therefore becomes computationally expensive and time consuming as generating the simulations using the actual model or called full model of the structure. In this regard, this paper suggests using Kriging metamodel as a viable alternative of the actual model to reduce computational costs in seismic fragility computation. The Kriging metamodel is constructed based on the training samples of input and corresponding output responses of the structure. The validation of this method is performed on two numerical examples.
Use of Kriging metamodels for seismic fragility analysis of structures
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
2019-10-11
6 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Blind Kriging: A New Method for Developing Metamodels
Online Contents | 2008
|Error Metrics and the Sequential Refinement of Kriging Metamodels
Online Contents | 2015
|Prediction of Gasolines Performance in Internal Combustion Engines Using Kriging Metamodels
SAE Technical Papers | 2015
|SAE Technical Papers | 2020
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
|