Abstract Third-body—driven plane changes, i.e., plane change maneuvers that use third-body forces to reduce the cost of the maneuver, are compared to one-impulse plane changes, the only classical approach still applicable in environments strongly perturbed by a third body. It is shown in particular that, although having inherent restrictions, the realizable range of third-body—driven plane changes covers a wide range of initial conditions and is closely related to the existence of ±180° plane changes. The question of the optimal method for performing a given plane change with given initial conditions and the maximal cost of such transfers are addressed semi-analytically to help in the design of such maneuvers in third-body—perturbed environments. It is found that third-body—driven plane changes are more fuel efficient than one-impulse maneuvers for plane changes values larger than ∼45° (exact value depending on the case considered). The examples of Mars and Callisto orbiters have been used to illustrate the theory.
Third-Body-Driven vs. One-Impulse Plane Changes
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences ; 57 , 3 ; 545-559
2009-07-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Third-Body-Driven vs. One-Impulse Plane Changes
Online Contents | 2009
|Third-Body-Driven vs. One-Impulse Plane Changes
Online Contents | 2009
|Third Body Driven Versus One Impulse Plane Changes (AAS 03-519)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Optimal Plane Changes Using Third-Body Forces
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|An Analysis of Multiple-Revolution Third Body Driven Plane Change Maneuvers (AAS 11-400)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
|