Markings or observable anomalies on vehicle seat belt restraint systems can be classified into two categories: (1) Those caused by collision forces, or “loading marks” and (2) those created by noncollision situations, or “normal usage marks” [1]. A survey was conducted of both crash tested and non-crash tested vehicles in order to collect data on both categories of markings. This paper examines and analyzes the markings caused by both collision and noncollision load scenarios in order to illustrate and evaluate their unique differences as well as provide a general pattern of severity relative to different loading conditions.
Comparison of Collision and Noncollision Marks on Vehicle Restraint Systems
Sae Technical Papers
SAE World Congress & Exhibition ; 2008
2008-04-14
Conference paper
English
2008-01-0160 Comparison of Collision and Noncollision Marks on Vehicle Restraint Systems
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Comparison of collision and noncollision marks on vehicle restraint systems
Automotive engineering | 2008
|Comparison of Collision and Noncollision Marks on Vehicle Restraint Systems
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Survey results and discussion of noncollision seat belt restraint system markings
Automotive engineering | 1999
|Survey Results and Discussion of Noncollision Seat Belt Restraint System Markings
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|