The present study investigated the effects of the structural stiffness of the head restraint and its attachment rigidity on the biomechanical responses and related injury measures of the neck in a rear impact vehicular collision. A series of simulated rear impacts were conducted using a mid-sized male test dummy seated in a modified late-model front passenger seat on a deceleration crash sled with a FMVSS 202 pulse. Preliminary results demonstrated that a more rigid head restraint in its design and attachment produced lesser values in most biomechanical injury measures such as neck shear force, neck extension bending moment, tension-extension neck injury criterion (Nij), shear-moment neck injury criterion (Nkm), and head-torso relative extension angular displacement. This is true for a wide range of seatback recliner stiffness. This suggests that a more rigid head restraint may have a protective advantage over a more pliant one for the neck in a rear impact. The result of this study underscores the need for dynamic testing to completely evaluate the performance of head restraint system.
Effect of Head-Restraint Rigidity on Whiplash Injury Risk
Sae Technical Papers
SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition ; 2004
2004-03-08
Conference paper
English
Effect of Head-Restraint Rigidity on Whiplash Injury Risk
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Effect of head-restraint rigidity on whiplash injury risk
Automotive engineering | 2004
|Effect of Head-Restraint Rigidity on Whiplash Injury Risk
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|2004-01-0332 Effect of Head-Restraint Rigidity on Whiplash Injury Risk
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|