This article addresses the architecture development for a commercial vehicle fuel cell electric powertrain by establishing a clear multi-step formalized workflow that employs a unique technoeconomic solution for architecture selection. The power capability of the fuel cell, the energy capacity and chemistry of the electrical energy storage (battery), the DC-DC converter (including the input current rating and isolation resistance requirements), the traction drive solution, the on-board hydrogen storage solution, and the real-time power-split management of the fuel cell and the battery are all considered and developed in this effort. The methods were used to select architecture for Class 8 urban, regional, and line haul applications. When compared to traditional load-following power-split controllers, an energy management power-split controller can increase system energy efficiency by up to 19.5%. The energy-efficient power-split controller may increase the required battery capacity for an equivalent life by up to 2.6 times. The impact on the total cost of ownership (TCO) for a variety of financial cases demonstrates that high C-rate capable batteries have the potential to provide better TCO solutions over a six-year vehicle life than low C-rate capable batteries. To achieve TCO parity with the 600 A non-isolated DC-DC converter case, the specific choice of the fuel cell DC-DC converter to achieve a target power output based on current levels (from 500 A to 2400 A) shows that efficiency decreases and cost increases due to the higher current, requiring fuel cell prices to decrease by $50–$100/kW, $60–$110/kW, and $100–$220/kW for urban, regional, and line haul applications, respectively. Key recommendations for powertrain system architectures are provided, with specifics based on vehicle dynamics, mission and application characteristics, end customer use-case profile, critical powertrain component costs, and architecture selection cost function. This study rigorously demonstrates the interplay of the above parameters, with a focus on TCO, and provides application decision-makers with a mechanism and well-defined set of impact factors to consider as part of their architecture selection process.
Developing Fuel Cell Electric Powertrain Architectures for Commercial Vehicles
Sae International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Energy Environment and Policy
Sae J. Steep
2022-12-07
39 pages
Conference paper
English
Distributed drivetrain architectures for commercial vehicles with a hybrid electric powertrain
European Patent Office | 2019
|DISTRIBUTED DRIVETRAIN ARCHITECTURES FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES WITH A HYBRID ELECTRIC POWERTRAIN
European Patent Office | 2018
|DISTRIBUTED DRIVETRAIN ARCHITECTURES FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES WITH A HYBRID ELECTRIC POWERTRAIN
European Patent Office | 2017
|DISTRIBUTED DRIVETRAIN ARCHITECTURES FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES WITH A HYBRID ELECTRIC POWERTRAIN
European Patent Office | 2018
|EDrive & Fuel Cell powertrain systems engineering for commercial vehicles
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2021
|