The requirement for crew resource management (CRM), or aircrew coordination training (ACT) in military parlance, has been well documented and attested to. In addition, aircraft systems training has become more intense and more in-depth in the new aircraft designs, especially in multi-crew and complex aircraft such as the MV-22 Osprey Tiltrotor. (see Figure 1) Former training systems detailed training procedures that called for classroom training and simulation/simulator training followed by flight training. Improvements in aircraft flight skills training provide increased flying training capability coupled with reduced training time by integrating a mixed simulation/flight training syllabus, e.g. two to three simulation periods followed by one or two flight training periods covering the same material/skills. In addition, the simulation training will introduce new skills; the following flight periods will further refine/hone those skills.With the increased complexity of the V-22 systems, and the increased emphasis and requirement for crew coordination, the V-22 became a candidate, and in some cases, demanded, an integrated aircraft systems, flight and ACT training system.
“Greater Than the Sum of its Parts” Integrated Flight Training/Aircrew Coordination
Sae Technical Papers
Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition ; 1994
1994-10-01
Conference paper
English
"Greater Than the Sum of its Parts" Integrated Flight Training/Aircrew Coordination
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|Aircrew Coordination Training: The Missing Link
Online Contents | 1995
Analysis of P-3 Aircrew Coordination Training
NTIS | 1992
|Training Pilots to Classify Aircrew Coordination Behaviors
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|IEEE | 1988
|