Illustrated within this paper is Minnesota State University, Mankato Automotive Engineering Technology program's entry to the 2003 Clean Snowmobile Challenge held in Houghton, Michigan. Encompassed in this report are the criteria of performance, emissions, chassis, noise control, and results. Characterized in these criteria are the engine modifications and reasoning for the changes implemented.The 2003 Clean Snowmobile Challenge (CSC) allowed the MSU students to concentrate on a thorough comparison of a two-stroke cycle engine vs. a four-stroke cycle engine in the areas listed. Extensive modifications and tests were performed on these two engines in order to provide significant data for performance, emissions and noise.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Comparison of an E10 Direct Injection Two-Stroke Cycle Engine and an E85 Four-Stroke Cycle Engine


    Additional title:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    Small Engine Technology Conference & Exposition ; 2003



    Publication date :

    2003-09-15




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    Four Stroke Cycle Engine Development

    Satoh,K. / Niigata Engng.,JP | Automotive engineering | 1979


    2-stroke cycle gasoline engine with direct fuel injection system

    Shim,H.S. / Lee,D.U. / Yoon,K.J. et al. | Automotive engineering | 1994


    Swirl in a four-stroke cycle engine cylinder

    Tanabe,S. / Hamamoto,Y / Ohigashi,S. et al. | Automotive engineering | 1978


    Four Stroke Cycle Gasoline Engine Oils for Motorcycle

    Hasegawa, Hiroaki / Akagi, Masatoshi / Nakamura, Mitsuyoshi et al. | SAE Technical Papers | 2006


    Gasoline Direct Injection for a Loop-Scavenged Two-Stroke Cycle Engine

    Nakayama, Mitsushige / Sato, Tadanori | SAE Technical Papers | 1987