There are many different numerical approaches to ice accretion simulation. Little comparison has been made between those approaches to identify the best tool for a given application. This paper presents a comparison exercise between 2D codes (CANICE-BA and LEWICE) and 3D codes (CANICE3D-BA, LEWICE3D and FENSAP-ICE). It also compares the 3D first generation code (panel method with Lagrangian droplet trajectory tracking) CANICE3D-BA to the 3D second generation code (Navier-Stokes with Eulerian droplet tracking) FENSAP-ICE. The paper includes a description of the different methodologies. The first comparison exercise is done using three 2D cases for which experimental ice shapes are available. The second exercise addresses a water collection efficiency over an isolated tail for which experimental data is available. Finally, an ice accretion comparison is presented in a DLR4 wing-body configuration.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    A Comparison Exercise of Ice Accretion Simulations with 2D and 3D Solvers


    Additional title:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    2007 SAE Aircraft and Engine Icing International Conference ; 2007



    Publication date :

    2007-09-24




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    A Comparison Exercise of Ice Accretion Simulations with 2D and 3D Solvers

    Pueyo, A. / Brette, C. / Vafa, S. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007