A comparison between ‘Quasi-Transient’ and Steady-State (SAE J1349) engine dynamometer horsepower test procedures was conducted to determine the degree of correlation between the two test methods. Measurements demonstrated that the peak horsepower and torque measured using both techniques was similar. This information is useful as a development tool, because the ‘Quasi-Transient’ procedure allows for data to be collected over the engine RPM range much faster then the Steady-State method, allowing for the accurate testing of more engine/exhaust configurations in a shorter amount of time.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Comparison of Engine Dynamometer Test Procedures


    Additional title:

    Sae Technical Papers


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    International Truck & Bus Meeting & Exposition ; 1993



    Publication date :

    1993-11-01




    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English




    Comparison of engine dynamometer test procedures

    Clegg,M. / Hall,G. / Jurick,G. et al. | Automotive engineering | 1993


    New TACOM DYNAMOMETER May Improve Engine Test Procedures

    Watts,R.J. / Taylor,G. / US Army,US | Automotive engineering | 1984


    Passenger Car - Braking Device - Dynamometer Test Procedures

    Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan(JSAE) | TIBKAT | 2000