Abstract Virtually every U.S. bus system today charges its customers flat fares. Recent trends, however, suggest that passengers are traveling farther and proportionally more during peak hours, factors which have contributed toward transit's cost spiral. As deficits continue to soar and available funding tightens, current pricing rationales must be seriously questioned. This paper assesses the efficiency and equity impacts of three California transit agencies' fare structures. Short-distance, off-peak patrons are found to heavily cross-subsidize long-haul commuters. Fares differentiated by distance and time-of-day, in contrast, could improve the transit industry's fiscal posture while eliminating differences in payment rates. Barriers to their implementation remain formidable, however, both in terms of current fare collection capabilities and political acceptability.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Flat versus differentiated transit pricing: What's a fair fare?


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Publication date :

    1981




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Print


    Language :

    English



    Classification :

    BKL:    55.80 Verkehrswesen, Transportwesen: Allgemeines / 74.75 Verkehrsplanung, Verkehrspolitik
    Local classification TIB:    535/7000



    Fair Fare Policies: Pricing Policies that Benefit Transit-Dependent Riders

    Taylor, Kendra C. / Jones, Erick C. | Springer Verlag | 2011


    Is flat fare fair? Equity impact of fare scheme change

    Rubensson, Isak / Susilo, Yusak / Cats, Oded | Elsevier | 2020



    Transit marketing and fare structure

    National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, USA | TIBKAT | 1985


    Transit Marketing and Fare Structure

    M. R. Cutler / C. Walb / R. Booth et al. | NTIS | 1985