Despite the introduction of flight, duty, and rest time regulations to reduce the risk of sleepiness, airline pilots often encounter elevated sleepiness during flight. To combat this sleepiness, in some instances, pilots can take a short nap on the flight deck (controlled rest) to improve their alertness. Little is known, however, as to when and how often this countermeasure is used operationally. Methods: Forty-four pilots from a European carrier wore actiwatches and filled in an electronic sleep and work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in data from 239 flights. Self-reported in-flight rest periods were used to set rest intervals and sleep was estimated within these intervals using Philips Actiware 6.0.9. Wake threshold selection was set to medium; sleep threshold detection algorithm was set to 10 immobile minutes at sleep onset and sleep end. Timing of sleep periods was analyzed relative to home base time. Results: Preliminary analyses showed that controlled rest was taken on 46% (n=110) of flights. On 23 flights (10%) pilots reported taking two controlled rest periods. Sleep, as estimated by actigraphy, was achieved during 80% (n=106) of controlled rest periods. The mean sleep duration was 32 (± 12) minutes estimated within successful controlled rest periods. Approximately two-thirds (67.5%, n=81) of all rest periods were initiated during home base time night (0000h-0800h). On 11% (n=26) of flights, pilots also reported taking bunk rest (longer rest period in a designated sleeping facility).Conclusion:This study shows that controlled rest is commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on the flight deck. Further analysis is required to determine what other factors contribute to the decision to take controlled rest, and how effective it is in reducing sleepiness on the flight deck.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Controlled Rest: Profile of Use, Challenges, and Best Practices


    Contributors:

    Conference:

    Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) Forum Meeting ; 2019 ; San Francisco, CA, United States


    Publication date :

    2019-10-01


    Type of media :

    Miscellaneous


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    The Challenges of Armor Testing & Best Practices

    Derosa, S. / AHS International | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011


    Best Practices

    Online Contents | 2014


    Best Practices

    Online Contents | 2014


    Best Practices

    Online Contents | 2014


    Best Practices

    Online Contents | 2014