Most view the Apollo Program as expensive. It was. But, a human mission to Mars will be orders of magnitude more difficult and costly. Recently, NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign (EMC) mapped out a step-wise approach for exploring Mars and the Mars-moon system. It is early in the planning process but because approximately 80% of the total life cycle cost is committed during preliminary design, there is an effort to emphasize cost reduction methods up front. Amongst the options, commonality across small habitat elements shows promise for consolidating the high bow-wave costs of Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (DDT&E) while still accommodating each end-item's functionality. In addition to DDT&E, there are other cost and operations benefits to commonality such as reduced logistics, simplified infrastructure integration and with inter-operability, improved safety and simplified training. These benefits are not without a cost. Some habitats are sub-optimized giving up unique attributes for the benefit of the overall architecture and because the first item sets the course for those to follow, rapidly developing technology may be excluded. The small habitats within the EMC include the pressurized crew cabins for the ascent vehicle,
Small Habitat Commonality Reduces Cost for Human Mars Missions
AIAA Space 2015 ; 2015 ; Pasadena, CA, United States
2015-08-31
Conference paper
No indication
English
Small Habitat Commonality Reduces Cost for Human Mars Missions (AIAA 2015-4455)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2015
|Mars Habitat Commonality: CPP-HAB
NTRS | 2018
|Mars Transit/Surface Habitat Commonality Studies
NTRS | 2018
|