Four missions have successfully employed aerobraking at Venus and Mars to reduce the spacecraft orbit period and achieve the desired orbit geometry. The propellant mass reductions enabled by the aerobraking technique allow the use of smaller launch systems, which translate to significant savings in launch costs for flight projects. However, there is a significant increase in mission risk associated with the use of aerobraking. Flying a spacecraft through a planetary atmosphere hundreds of times during months of around-the-clock operations places the spacecraft in harm's way, and is extraordinarily demanding on the flight team. There is a cost/risk trade that must be evaluated when a project is choosing between a mission baseline that includes aerobraking, or selecting a larger launch vehicle to enable purely propulsive orbit insertion. This paper provides a brief history of past and future aerobraking missions, describes the aerobraking technique, summarizes the costs associated with aerobraking, and concludes with a suggested methodology for evaluating the cost/risk trade when considering the aerobraking approach.
Aerobraking Cost and Risk Decisions
Space Systems Engineering Conference ; 2005 ; Atlanta, GA, United States
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets ; 44 , 6
2006-10-18
Preprint
No indication
English
Aerobraking cost/risk decisions
NTRS | 2005
|Aerobraking Cost and Risk Decisions
AIAA | 2007
|Aerobraking Cost and Risk Decisions
Online Contents | 2007
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|NTIS | 2004
|