The Enhanced Oceanic Operations Human-In-The-Loop In-Trail Procedure (ITP) Validation Simulation Study investigated the viability of an ITP designed to enable oceanic flight level changes that would not otherwise be possible. Twelve commercial airline pilots with current oceanic experience flew a series of simulated scenarios involving either standard or ITP flight level change maneuvers and provided subjective workload ratings, assessments of ITP validity and acceptability, and objective performance measures associated with the appropriate selection, request, and execution of ITP flight level change maneuvers. In the majority of scenarios, subject pilots correctly assessed the traffic situation, selected an appropriate response (i.e., either a standard flight level change request, an ITP request, or no request), and executed their selected flight level change procedure, if any, without error. Workload ratings for ITP maneuvers were acceptable and not substantially higher than for standard flight level change maneuvers, and, for the majority of scenarios and subject pilots, subjective acceptability ratings and comments for ITP were generally high and positive. Qualitatively, the ITP was found to be valid and acceptable. However, the error rates for ITP maneuvers were higher than for standard flight level changes, and these errors may have design implications for both the ITP and the study's prototype traffic display. These errors and their implications are discussed.
Enhanced Oceanic Operations Human-In-The-Loop In-Trail Procedure Validation Simulation Study
2008-06-01
Report
No indication
English
Pilot In-Trail Procedure Validation Simulation Study
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Pilot In-Trail Procedure Validation Simulation Study
AIAA | 2008
|Pilot In-Trail Procedure Validation Simulation Study
NTRS | 2008
|AIAA-2019-2829: In-Trail Procedure for Improved Oceanic Air Traffic Operations
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2019
|