Objectives: a) Map the vortex effects; b) Formation Auto-Pilot Requirements. Two NASA F/A-18 aircraft in formation: a) NASA 845 Systems Research Aircraft; b) NASA 847 Support Aircraft. Flight Conditions: M = 0.56, 25000 feet (Subsonic condition); b) M = 0.86, 36000 feet (Transonic condition). Nose-To-Tail (N2T) Distances: 20, 55, 110 and 190 feet. Lessons learned: a) Controllable flight in vortex is possible with pilot feedback (displays); b) Position hold at best C(sub D), is attainable; c) Best drag location is close to max rolling moment; e) Drag reductions demonstrated up to 22% (WFE up to 20%); f) Induced drag results compare favorably with simple prediction model; g) "Sweet Spot" (lateral & vertical area > 25%) is larger than predicted; h) Larger wing overlaps result in sign reversals in roll, yaw; i) As predicted, favorable effects degrade gradually with increased nose-to-tail distances after peaking at 3 span lengths aft; and j) Demonstrated - over 100 N mi (>15%) range improvement and 650 lbs (14%) fuel savings on actual simulated F/A-18 cruise mission.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Autonomous Formation Flight: Project Overview


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    2008-02-08


    Type of media :

    Conference paper


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Autonomous Formation Flight: Project Overview

    J. Cole / B. Cobleigh / J. Vachon et al. | NTIS | 2008


    Autonomous Formation Flight

    Schkolnik, Gerard S. / Cobleigh, Brent | NTRS | 2004


    Abort Flight Test Project Overview

    Sitz, Joel | NTRS | 2007


    Autonomous formation flight

    Giulietti, F. / Pollini, L. / Innocenti, M. | Tema Archive | 2000