Human rated space vehicles have historically employed a Backup Flight System (BFS) for the main purpose of mitigating the loss of the primary avionics control system. Throughout these projects, however, the underlying philosophy and technical implementation vary greatly. This paper attempts to coalesce each of the past space vehicle program's BFS design and implementation methodologies with the accompanying underlining philosophical arguments that drove each program to such decisions. The focus will be aimed at Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, and Space Shuttle However, the ideologies and implementation of several commercial and military aircraft are incorporated as well to complete the full breadth view of BFS development across the varying industries. In particular to the non-space based vehicles is the notion of deciding not to utilize a BFS. A diverse analysis of BFS to primary system benefits in terms of reliability against all aspects of project development are reviewed and traded. The risk of engaging the BFS during critical stages of flight (e.g. ascent and entry), the level of capability of the BFS (subset capability of main system vs. equivalent system), and the notion of dissimilar hardware and software design are all discussed. Finally, considerations for employing a BFS on future human-rated space missions are reviewed in light of modern avionics architectures and mission scenarios implicit in exploration beyond low Earth orbit.
Human-Rated Space Vehicle Backup Flight Systems
AIAA Space 2004 Conference ; 2004 ; San Diego, CA, United States
2004-01-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Human Rated Space Vehicle Backup Flight Systems
AIAA | 2004
|AIAA-2004-5834 Human Rated Space Vehicle Backup Flight Systems
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Safety Requirements for Human Rated Space Systems
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|