This report represents a systematic effort to describe how NASA's new technology reporting system operates today, and how that system might be enhanced. Although the system has run for more than two decades, it is not well documented in terms of organization, operational practices, or other program benchmarks. The study seeks to identify and assess incentives or disincentives to reporting, program management, program follow through, and the feasibility of various means for improving the general process. Initially, it was hoped that the study team might uncover the kind of information that would permit the determination of some 'average' sequence of events (or a time line) from the point of identifying a solution to technical 'need' to the point where its solution was actually reported to NASA. Information regarding this objective proved to be too elusive, primarily because early probes revealed that con- tractor awareness of the new technology requirements generally was too poor to provide useful information. The report that follows is based primarily upon documents furnished by NASA Headquarters, by Field Center technology utilization officers, and interviews with persons knowledgeable about the system. Visits were made to seven Field Centers: Ames Research Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Johnson Space Center, Langley Research Center, Lewis Research Center, and Marshall Space Flight Center. Other documents were furnished by officials of major aerospace corporations. Detailed interviews were conducted with Field Center technology utilization officials, project engineers or scientists, patent counsels, and other Field Center officials who had knowledge about the new technology reporting system. Interviews also were conducted with knowledgeable officials from a number of the primary aerospace companies. Numeric data was obtained from regular NASA reports, from original sources such as, NASA Tech Briefs, or from contractor reports. I am indebted to dozens of persons in both NASA and industry who took time to assist in the data collection by being interviewed, and through answering follow up questions on the telephone. Individuals interviewed and their affiliations are shown in Appendix A. I am most grateful to them for their kind assistance. A note of thanks is due to the other members of the DRI study team: Jody Briles, Kathy Hirst, and Joel Johnson. The responsibility for this report, its accuracy, and the nature of the observations and conclusions rest solely with the author. Text or citations in the numbered footnotes are to be found at the end of each chapter.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    NASA's New Technology Reporting System: A Review and Future Prospects


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1985-06-01


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    NASA's Legacy of Technology Transfer and Prospects for Future Benefits

    Comstock, Douglas / Lockney, Daniel | AIAA | 2007



    NASA's Legacy of Technology Transfer and Prospects for Future Benefits AIAA Paper

    Comstock, D. / Lockney, D. / American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007


    Aviation Safety Incident Reporting: NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System

    Connell, L. J. / Transportation Research Board | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000