The primary function of the propulsion system of a space station in LEO is to provide altitude maintenance to compensate for the effects of atmospheric drag. The paper investigates the trade-offs in the propulsion system design as a function of the propulsion system performance measured in terms of the on-orbit resources available to the propulsion system. Five low-thrust propulsion systems were analyzed, ranging from those that can use on-board waste products to state-of-the-art high-performance electric propulsion systems (mixed waste gas resistojet, water resistojet, hydrogen oxygen thruster, hydrazine arc-jet, and plasma thruster). The results of the analysis indicate that the average optimal altitude strategy decreases with increasing specific impulse of the propulsion system and increases with increasing costs of propellant resupply.
Propulsion system design trade-offs for space stations
AIAA, SAE, ASME, and ASEE, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit ; 1993 ; Monterey, CA, United States
1993-06-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Propulsion system design trade-offs for space stations
AIAA | 1993
|Cubesat Asteroid Mission: Propulsion Trade-offs
NTIS | 2014
|A Cubesat Asteroid Mission: Propulsion Trade-offs
NTRS | 2014
|Trade offs between high and low enriched uranium fueled space nuclear power and propulsion systems
TIBKAT | 2020
|