A parametric cost model for mercury ion propulsion modules is presented. A detailed work breakdown structure is included. Cost estimating relationships were developed for the individual subsystems and the nonhardware items (systems engineering, software, etc.). Solar array and power processor unit (PPU) costs are the significant cost drivers. Simplification of both of these subsystems through applications of advanced technology (lightweight solar arrays and high-efficiency, self-radiating PPUs) can reduce costs. Comparison of the performance and cost of several chemical propulsion systems with the Hg ion module are also presented. For outer-planet missions, advanced solar electric propulsion (ASEP) trip times and O2/H2 propulsion trip times are comparable. A three-year trip time savings over the baselined NTO/MMH propulsion system is possible with ASEP.
Electric propulsion cost estimation
1985-09-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Electric propulsion cost estimation
AIAA | 1985
|Cost-Optimum Electric Propulsion for Constellations
AIAA | 2002
|Electric vehicles - A cost model of electric propulsion systems
Tema Archive | 2012
|LOW-COST INTERPLANETARY MISSIONS USING ELECTRIC PROPULSION
Online Contents | 1996
|