A discussion is presented of the question of establishing a boundary between air space and outer space. Four theories and approaches for establishing a delimitation between air space and outer space are examined. Spatial approaches include demarcation based on the division of the atmosphere into layers, demarcation based on aerodynamic characteristics of flight instrumentalities (von Karman Line), demarcation according to the lowest perigee of an orbiting satellite, and demarcation based upon the earth's gravitational effects. The functionalist approach is based on the delimitation or definition of the air space/outer space regime by the purpose and activities for which an object is designed in air space or outer space. The arbitrarist approach is supported by those who wish to draw an arbitrary line between air space and outer space. It is proposed that a pragmatist approach will be more useful than the other three approaches. The pragmatist approach advocates not establishing a boundary between air space and outer space at the present time or in the immediate future. It is argued that there are at present no serious problems that can be resolved by the definition/delimitation of air space and outer space.
Delimitation of air space and outer space - Is such a boundary needed now?
Earth-oriented space activities and their legal implications; Symposium ; 1981 ; Montreal, Canada
1983-01-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Needed: Space Maintenance Tools
SAE Technical Papers | 1970
|Supervised space robots are needed in space exploration
NTRS | 1994
|Base Points and Baselines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
|Supervised Space Robots Are Needed in Space Exploration
NTIS | 1994
|