Five levels of autopilot complexity were flown in a single engine instrument flight rules (IFR) simulation for several different IFR terminal operations. A comparison was made of the five levels of complexity ranging from no-autopilot to a fully coupled lateral and vertical guidance mode to determine the relative benefits vs. complexity/cost of state of the art autopilot capability in the IFR terminal area. Of the five levels tested, the heading select mode made the largest relative difference in decreasing workload and simplifying the approach task. It was also found that the largest number of blunders was detected with the most highly automated mode. The data also showed that, regardless of the autopilot mode, performance during an IFR approach was highly dependent on the type of approach being flown. These results indicate that automation can be useful when making IFR approaches in a high workload environment, but also that some disturbing trends are associated with some of the higher levels of automation found in state of the art autopilots.
General aviation single pilot IFR autopilot study
1981-03-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
General aviation single pilot IFR autopilot study
NTRS | 1983
|Automation Effects in General Aviation: Pilot Responses to Autopilot Failures and Alarms
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Sperry SPL.45 Autopilot for General Aviation
Emerald Group Publishing | 1966