A representative set of space systems, functions, and missions for NASA and DoD from which launch vehicle requirements and characteristics was established as well as a set of air-breathing launch vehicles based on graduated technology capabilities corresponding to increasingly higher staging Mach numbers. The utility of the air-breathing launch vehicle candidates based on lift-off weight, performance, technology needs, and risk was assessed and costs were compared to alternative concepts. The results indicate that a fully reusable launch vehicle, whether two stage or one stage, could potentially reduce the cost per flight 60-80% compared to that for a partially reusable vehicle but would require advances in thermal protection system technology. A two-stage-to-orbit, parallel-lift vehicle with an air-breathing booster would cost approximately the same as a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, but the former would have greater flexibility and a significantly reduced developmental risk. A twin-booster, subsonic-staged, parallel-lift vehicle represents the lowest system cost and developmental risk. However, if a large supersonic turbojet engine in the 350,000-N thrust class were available, supersonic staging would be preferred, and the investment in development would be returned in reduced program cost.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Earth-to-orbit reusable launch vehicles: A comparative assessment


    Contributors:

    Publication date :

    1978-02-01


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English





    Reusable launch vehicles

    Osmun, W.G. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1964



    Staging Variables on Two-Stage-To-Orbit Reusable Launch Vehicles

    Nilsen, James / Franke, Milton / Anthenien, R et al. | AIAA | 2005


    Weight Analysis of Two-Stage-To-Orbit Reusable Launch Vehicles

    Caldwell, Richard / Franke, Milton / Eklund, Dean | AIAA | 2005