Review of the procedures used to select engines for transport and combat aircraft by illustrating the procedures for a long haul CTOL transport, a short haul VTOL transport, a long range SST, and a fighter aircraft. For the CTOL transport, it is shown that advances in noise technology and advanced turbine cooling technology will greatly reduce the airplane performance penalties associated with achieving low noise goals. A remote lift fan powered by a turbofan air generator is considered for the VTOL aircraft. In this case, the lift fan pressure ratio which maximizes payload also comes closest to meeting the noise goal. High turbine temperature in three different engines is considered for the SST. Without noise constraints it leads to an appreciable drop in DOC, but with noise constraints the reduction in DOC is very modest. For the fighter aircraft it is shown how specific excess power requirements play the same role in engine selection as noise constraints for commercial airplanes.
Engine selection for transport and combat aircraft.
NATO, AGARD, Conference on Aircraft Performance - Prediction Methods and Optimization ; 1972 ; Brussels, Belgium
1972-04-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Engine selection for transport and combat aircraft
NTRS | 1973
|Engine selection for transport and combat aircraft
NTRS | 1972
|Engine Selection for Transport and Combat Aircraft
NTIS | 1972
|Spey Engine for AMX Combat Aircraft
Emerald Group Publishing | 1983
Engineering Index Backfile | 1953
|