Results of the SERT II flight indicate that the hollow cathode neutralizer not only represents a power and propellant weight penalty but can be a contributing cause to accelerator grid erosion. Tests with a 30-cm diameter thruster show that a neutralizer position of approximately 9 cm axially downstream of the accelerator grid and approximately 9 cm radially away from the outer edge of the accelerator grid and pointing parallel to the thruster axis provides the best overall performance. The estimated grid wear rate was less than 0.08 mm in 10,000 hours. The coupling voltage was approximately 17 volts at a neutralizer flow rate of 22 equivalent milliamperes of mercury and a beam current of 1.5 amperes. Neutralizer power was 31 watts and the effect of neutralizer flow on overall propellant utilization efficiency is a 1.2 percentage point reduction at a thruster utilization efficiency of 90 percent. The neutralizer position defined in tests with a 30 cm thruster was tested with a 15 cm SERT II thruster. When the neutralizer was relocated further downstream with this different orientation, accelerator impingement current due to neutralizer operation was reduced by approximately a factor of seven and was nearly independent of neutralizer operation.
Performance of a neutralizer for electron bombardment thruster
Aerospace Sci. Meeting ; 1972 ; San Diego
1971-01-01
Report
No indication
English